Prevalence, severity, and neurosurgical management of abusive head trauma during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: Reports published during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (Sars-CoV-2) pandemic suggest that hospitals potentially experienced an increased incidence in the presentation of abusive head trauma (AHT) in children; however, it remains unknown if the pandemic influenced the severity or need for neurosurgical intervention during this time. METHODS: This study is a post hoc analysis of a prospectively collected database of pediatric patients who sustained traumatic head injuries from 2018 to 2021 and were treated at the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh that was screened for concern of AHT at the time of presentation. Pairwise univariate analysis of AHT prevalence, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, intracranial pathology, and neurosurgical interventions was performed to investigate differences before, during, and after the initial lockdown in Pennsylvania, which was defined as March 23, 2020, to August 26, 2020. RESULTS: Of 2181 pediatric patients who presented with head trauma, 263 (12.1%) with AHT were identified. Prevalence of AHT did not differ during (12.4% before vs 10.0% during, p = 0.31) or following (12.2% after, p = 0.92) lockdown. Need for neurosurgery after AHT remained unchanged during lockdown (10.7% before vs 8.3% during, p = 0.72) and after (10.5% after, p = 0.97). Patients did not differ in terms of sex, age, or race between periods. Average GCS score was lower after lockdown (13.9 before vs 11.9 after, p = 0.008) but not during (12.3, p = 0.062). In this cohort, mortality associated with AHT was 4.8 times higher during lockdown (4.3% before vs 20.8% during, p = 0.002) and returned to pre-lockdown rates thereafter (7.8%, p = 0.27). The primary contributor to mortality was ischemic brain injury (5% before vs 20.8% during, p = 0.005). Patients were 5.5 times more likely to undergo decompressive hemicraniectomy in the months after lockdown compared with prior (1.2% vs 6.6%, p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: The authors have presented the findings of the first study to examine the prevalence and neurosurgical management of AHT during the Sars-Cov-2 lockdown in Pennsylvania. The overall prevalence of AHT was not affected by lockdown; however, patients were more likely to experience mortality or traumatic ischemia during lockdown. The GCS score of AHT patients was significantly lower, and these patients were more likely to require decompressive hemicraniectomy after the initial lockdown period.

Increased severity of abusive head trauma during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Abusive head trauma (AHT) is the leading cause of death from physical abuse in children. Reports regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on rates and severity of AHT are limited and with conflicting results. OBJECTIVE: To determine the number and clinical characteristics of AHT cases presenting to a pediatric tertiary care center during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the two prior years. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients <5 years old diagnosed with AHT at a single pediatric tertiary care center over a three-year period. METHODS: Data were obtained for the pandemic year and two years before, including demographics, length of stay, physical and retinal examination findings, radiologic studies, electroencephalogram results, and mortality. RESULTS: There were 27 cases of AHT during the first year of the pandemic and 55 during the two pre-pandemic years. Length of stay was similar for the two cohorts. The mortality rate was higher during the pandemic (29.6 % vs. 3.6 %; p < .01), as were the proportion of patients with retinal hemorrhages (84.6 % vs. 41.5 %; p < .01) and abnormal cervical spine imaging (52.6 % vs. 21.2 %; p = .02). There were no differences in age, sex, race, abnormalities on dermatological exam, skeletal surveys, and electroencephalograms. CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe an increase in the number of patients with AHT during the pandemic but did see an increase in mortality, patients with retinal hemorrhages, and patients with abnormalities on cervical spine imaging. These data suggest a higher severity of AHT presenting to a pediatric tertiary care center during the pandemic.

Change in Incidence and Severity of Abusive Head Trauma in the Paediatric Age Group Pre- and During COVID-19 Lockdown in the North East of England.

Background: Abusive head trauma (AHT) is currently the accepted terminology that encompasses previously used terms such as non-accidental injury (NAI) or non-accidental head injury (NAHI) and shaken baby syndrome (SBS). It is AHT and its ocular manifestations that ophthalmologists are vital in identifying and reporting. Objectives: To investigate whether there is a change in the incidence or severity of AHT pre- and during COVID-19 lockdown. Participants and Settings: AHT cases reported between March-June 2019 and March-June 2020. Data will be collected from ***** **** ********* NHS Foundation Trust. Methods: A retrospective comparative study. Main Outcome Measures: Comparison of total number of children reported to child protection services pre- and during lockdown.Severity of reported cases.Ophthalmic involvement. Results: Of the pre-lockdown safeguarding referrals, 5/61 (8.19%) had confirmed AHT, and 4/40 (10%) of the during lockdown group were confirmed AHT. The absence of teachers was evident, as in the pre-lockdown group 40% (2) of referrals originated from schools compared to none during the lockdown period. Ophthalmic involvement was not present in any of the pre-lockdown cases and only 50% (2) of the during lockdown cases, with the appropriate proforma only used in one of these cases. Unfortunately, no further statistical testing was meaningful in light of the small sample size. Conclusions: The loss of the early warning detection mechanism provided by schools and health visitors may have contributed to both the change in presentation and severity of cases during the lockdown. There is also a need for ophthalmology and paediatrics to collaborate to ensure AHT cases are thoroughly investigated and documented.

The impact of the consensus statement on abusive head trauma in infants and young children.

It seems paradoxical that facts, data and science are still considered controversial despite the harrowing death of a multitude of people from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), an unparalleled health care crisis of our lifetime. In addition, while scientists are desperately attempting to produce a vaccine for COVID-19, a large segment of the populace still believes in conspiracies related to vaccines. Therefore, it is not surprising that the diagnosis of abusive head trauma (AHT) faces similar challenges - the difference being that AHT challenges are mostly in the realms of law courts rather than actual clinical management of these infants. Against this backdrop, the Child Abuse Imaging Committee of the Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR) collaborated with other leading experts to develop the consensus statement on AHT. This consensus statement has had a significant impact since its publication. It is now endorsed by 17 multinational, multidisciplinary organizations. The consensus statement has helped educate the diverse stakeholders of AHT and has helped further our understanding of AHT and the issues related to it. This could serve as the template for developing future consensus documents.